blog

What is the Difference Between Security Risk Management & Security Compliance

Security Risk management and the various areas it covers
Security Risk management and the various areas

As organizations increasingly rely on technology to store and process sensitive information, the importance of cybersecurity cannot be overstated. Many organisations implement security risk management and compliance strategies to protect against potential threats and maintain a secure environment.

While these two approaches may seem similar, they are distinct concepts with different purposes and processes. Understanding the difference between security risk management and security compliance is crucial for organizations looking to safeguard their assets and data effectively. 

This article will explore the key differences between security risk management and security compliance and how understanding these differences can help organizations improve their security posture.

Security Risk Management — Defined

Security risk management is identifying and mitigating potential threats to an organization. It involves the continuous assessment and evaluation of risks and implementing measures to prevent or mitigate them. 

Purpose

The primary purpose of security risk management is to identify and mitigate potential organisational threats. This involves continuously assessing the organization’s vulnerabilities and implementing measures to reduce the likelihood and impact of potential security breaches. This could include implementing strong passwords, securing network infrastructure, and training employees on cybersecurity best practices.

The goal of security risk management is to protect the organization from harm. This includes physical harms, such as damage to facilities or equipment, and financial harm, such as the loss of sensitive data or the cost of recovering from a security breach.

Security Compliance — Defined

Security compliance, on the other hand, refers to the adherence to laws, regulations, and industry standards related to cybersecurity. It involves meeting specific requirements set by external bodies, such as government agencies or industry associations. Security compliance aims to avoid legal penalties and fines that can result from non-compliance.

Purpose

The main purpose of security compliance is to adhere to cybersecurity laws, regulations, and industry standards. This could include things like the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for organizations that handle credit card transactions or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for healthcare organizations.

Meeting these requirements helps organizations avoid legal penalties and fines that can result from non-compliance. It also demonstrates to customers and other stakeholders that the organization is taking the necessary steps to protect sensitive information and maintain a secure environment.

Key Differences: Security Risk Management & Compliance

Despite serving similar purposes, security risk management and compliance have several key differences. One of the main differences is the focus of each approach. Security risk management is proactive, focusing on identifying and mitigating potential threats before they occur. Conversely, compliance is reactive, focusing on meeting specific requirements set by external bodies.

Another key difference is the process involved in each approach. Security risk management involves conducting a risk assessment to identify potential vulnerabilities and then implementing a risk management plan to address those vulnerabilities. 

Compliance, on the other hand, is concerned with meeting specific requirements set by external bodies. This could involve implementing specific controls or procedures or providing documentation to demonstrate compliance.

The Phoenix Security platform is a great tool for security risk management because it helps organizations analyze and contextualize potential threats across their attack surfaces. By taking data from security scanners and contextualizing, correlating, and prioritizing it, the platform offers a clear understanding of the actions that need to be taken to mitigate potential risks.

One of the key benefits of the Phoenix Security platform is that it provides a comprehensive view of an organization’s security posture. By analyzing data from multiple sources, it is able to identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize them based on their likelihood and impact. 

Phoenix Security — A Complete Security Risk Management Solution

Phoenix Security is a platform for security risk management because it helps organizations analyze and contextualize potential threats across their attack surfaces. By taking data from security scanners and contextualizing, correlating, and prioritizing it, the platform offers a clear understanding of the actions that need to be taken to mitigate potential risks.

One of the key benefits of the Phoenix Security platform is that it provides a comprehensive view of an organization’s security posture. By analyzing data from multiple sources, it is able to identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize them based on their likelihood and impact. 

Another advantage of the Phoenix Security platform is its ability to contextualize threats. By understanding the context in which a threat occurs, organizations are better able to understand the motivations behind an attack and the potential consequences of a breach. 

Bottom Line

Both security risk management and compliance are important for the overall security of an organization. Security risk management helps identify and mitigate potential threats, while compliance ensures that an organization is adhering to relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards. 

It is important for organizations to understand the differences between the two and implement both to protect against potential threats and maintain a secure environment effectively.

Sally is one of the expert content writers at Appsec Phoenix and a relationship manager Sally has been studying infosec and comes from a self-trained field with a passion for cybersecurity and application security.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

Explore the interplay between the MITRE ATT&CK framework and EPSS for effective vulnerability management. Learn how these tools help predict and prioritize cyber threats, with deep dives into the most and least exploited techniques. Stay ahead in cybersecurity with Phoenix’s advanced analysis.
Francesco Cipollone
The Cloud Security and AppSec teams at Phoenix Security are pleased to bring you another set of new Phoenix Security features and improvements for vulnerability management across application and cloud security engines. This release builds on top of previous releases with key additions and progress across multiple areas of the platform. Application Security Posture Management – Team Graph – Team Dashboard Access Update Asset and Vulnerability Management – Saved Filters – Introducing Asset Lifecycle Management – Introducing Vulnerability Lifecycle Management Integrations – Out-of-the-box Nuclei Scanning – Wiz Integration – Control Snyk ignored vulnerabilities Other Improvements – Navigate to Asset from Impact Explorer chart – Improved display of Impact and Exposure in Risk Elements
Alfonso Eusebio
Explore ASPM’s role in modern application security, offering a panoramic view that extends beyond code vulnerabilities. This guide demystifies concepts like traceability, reachability analysis, and asset lineage, pivotal for securing digital assets. Learn how ASPM empowers organizations with actionable insights for precise vulnerability management. #Cybersecurity #ASPM #ApplicationSecurity
Francesco Cipollone
Explore the transformative role of ASPM in cybersecurity. Uncover how Application Security Posture Management aligns business and security objectives for effective vulnerability management and risk reduction. Discover Phoenix Security’s innovative approach to tackling the staggering challenge of CVEs with a strategic focus on prioritization. #ASPM #Cybersecurity #VulnerabilityManagement
Francesco Cipollone
Explore the critical insights into the latest container security vulnerabilities named leaky vessels, including CVE-2024-21626, CVE-2024-23651, CVE-2024-23653, and CVE-2024-23652, BuildKit flaws, with our comprehensive guide on mitigation strategies, best practices for application security, and tips for robust vulnerability management in Docker and Kubernetes environments. Stay ahead in securing your container deployments against potential threats with ASPM help
Francesco Cipollone

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.